From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25978 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2010 19:44:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 25969 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2010 19:44:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:44:41 +0000 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E53188A171; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:44:38 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: wGYmmlSZ0KWkpGvSTgNxtpIGCpBgUMdm1GfEOWTULeQ= Received: from linux.local (p508B54ED.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.84.237]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CCC151C0012C; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:44:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 22CF31E52EC; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:44:37 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Keith Seitz Cc: viju vincent , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Issue with printing binary operator overloaded function on GDB 7.2 References: <4D18EB0D.5080200@redhat.com> X-Yow: Are you guys lined up for the METHADONE PROGRAM or FOOD STAMPS?? Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4D18EB0D.5080200@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:37:49 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 Keith Seitz writes: > On 12/22/2010 11:53 PM, viju vincent wrote: > >> * From GDB log >> {{{ >> print base::operator!= >> $17 = {bool (const base * const, const void&)} 0x9784 >> >> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp: print base::operator!= >> }}} > > What's a "const void&"? :-) > > FWIW, I've tried CVS head with the following GCCs: 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat > 4.4.5-2), 4.6.0 20101227 (experimental), and 4.5.2 (GCC), and none of them > exhibit the problem (cpexprs.exp passes as I expect it to). See . Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."