From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32540 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 13:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32533 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2004 13:14:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 13:14:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45C92C0917; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:14:26 +0100 (CET) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , cagney@gnu.org, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: getpid after vfork broken in recent glibc References: <404D2EB9.10607@gnu.org> <20040309025255.GA11922@nevyn.them.org> From: Andreas Schwab X-Yow: I HAVE to buy a new ``DODGE MISER'' and two dozen JORDACHE JEANS because my viewscreen is ``USER-FRIENDLY''!! Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "09 Mar 2004 08:38:15 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: > How about if glibc did us a small favor and invalidated its cached > PID on a vfork? This is about to be fixed now. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."