From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8436-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17335 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2002 10:14:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17328 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2002 10:14:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2002 10:14:51 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CD7D11E1E4; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:14:50 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sykes.suse.de: schwab set sender to schwab@suse.de using -f
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Why autoconf 2.13?
References: <200204110039.g3B0dCT03033@fred.ninemoons.com>
	<xnzo0agkez.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <87lmbtoq9r.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
	<xnr8llhn0d.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
X-Yow: Is it clean in other dimensions?
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 03:14:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <xnr8llhn0d.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
 (DJ Delorie's message of
 "11 Apr 2002 18:46:26 -0400
")
Message-ID: <jeads9z0ix.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.2.50 (ia64-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

|> Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
|> > Doing it will let us use a newer automake, which in turn will let us
|> > remove a bunch of hacks from various Makefile.am's.  Also it will mean
|> > that libgcj won't need to continue using its own hacked automake.  The
|> > big problem is just that nobody with the expertise has the time (or
|> > maybe interest :-).
|> 
|> Have they fixed the problem with old config.caches in 2.5 yet?

What's wrong with "rm config.cache"?  autoconf 2.50+ does not even create
a config.cache by default any more.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."