From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-30219-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6281 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2007 10:12:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 6266 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2007 10:12:37 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:12:33 +0000
Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F175D2B789; 	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:12:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Multiple breakpoint locations
References: <18233.63439.953202.586908@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> 	<je7ikln6r7.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <fhe3rc$cs0$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Yow: Three attractive BANK ROBBERS are discussing RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES and  MAKE-UP TECHNIQUE with them!!
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:12:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <fhe3rc$cs0$1@ger.gmane.org> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Wed\, 14 	Nov 2007 09\:16\:12 +0300")
Message-ID: <je4pfpnnjl.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2

Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> writes:

> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> writes:
>> 
>>> Yes, thanks.  It seems strange to me that the return type needs to be
>>> specified.  I thought with overloading, people talked about signature
>>> which is determined by the name and arguments but not the return type.
>> 
>> For function templates the return type is part of the signature (it can
>> be parameterised with a template argument).
>
> I'm not sure it's true.

It is valid for function template instantiations to only differ in the
return type.  See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-06/msg02798.html>
for an example.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."