From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18906 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2003 13:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18867 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 13:01:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 13:01:22 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A906E1451D; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:01:21 +0200 (MEST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June? References: <3EEA6240.4070401@redhat.com> <3EEDBA78.2030609@redhat.com> <20030616125110.GB16251@nevyn.them.org> From: Andreas Jaeger Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030616125110.GB16251@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:51:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1399 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:39:20AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> >Andrew Cagney writes: >> > >> > >> >>Still scheduled for 21st, how is that looking? >> > >> > >> >We currently have the following results from make check on >> >x86_64-linux-gnu: >> > >> > =3D=3D=3D gdb Summary =3D=3D=3D >> > >> ># of expected passes 8930 >> ># of unexpected failures 100 >> ># of unexpected successes 4 >> ># of expected failures 46 >> ># of known failures 23 >> ># of unresolved testcases 3 >> ># of untested testcases 6 >> ># of unsupported tests 1 >> >/usr/src/aj/build/gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version 2003-06-16-c= vs=20 >> >-nx >> > >> > >> >How does this look in comparison with other platforms? >>=20 >> Pretty much on par. break main, run, next definitly works. > > i386-linux is down at around ten failures. Alpha's a bit higher, Ten failures sounds fine! > sparc's really rotten (thousands). I hope that even if we branch on the 21st, we have the possibility to get fixes for those failures on x86_64 into the branch? Unfortunatly Michal is on vacation until the 28th and cannot do anything himself - and I'm also occupied :-( Andreas --=20 Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 197 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+7b+hOJpWPMJyoSYRAgEZAJ49ys7C2xk3vMNl/6yYbiOKgv67rwCfTW7I xjV7N8aCLuz6igk9RtDQInA= =eQi0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--