From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-32691-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29177 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2008 10:00:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 29168 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2008 10:00:39 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:19 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) 	id 1KPDuJ-0005EW-6d 	for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:15 +0000
Received: from 78.158.192.230 ([78.158.192.230])         by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:15 +0000
Received: from vladimir by 78.158.192.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:15 +0000
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
From:  Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Subject:  Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:00 -0000
Message-ID:  <g71b77$a9k$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <g6vcnn$g36$1@ger.gmane.org> <ud4ksmtk8.fsf@gnu.org> <200808020954.58589.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <u3alnn8o2.fsf@gnu.org> <g718vv$5hf$1@ger.gmane.org> <uy73flpgq.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7Bit
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> From:  Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
>> Date:  Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:22:07 +0400
> 
> I'm sorry, I cannot continue this discussion any further.  I was asked
> for my opinion, and I gave it.  I then was dragged into a prolonged
> discussion to justify my opinion on how such decisions should be made.
> I feel I said already everything I had to say on this matter, and
> anyone who wants to understand what I say has just to read my
> messages.
> 
> Please also note that at no point I said I was against the switch.  My
> point was that I don't see the goal, and without a goal I cannot judge
> whether the switch is justified.

The only question here is how to count your opinion? -0, +0, -1 or +1 or
pure abstain?

- Volodya