From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13442 invoked by alias); 2 May 2008 15:49:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 13430 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2008 15:49:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 15:49:17 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JrxVY-0001sE-3F for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 02 May 2008 15:49:12 +0000 Received: from 78.158.192.230 ([78.158.192.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2008 15:49:12 +0000 Received: from vladimir by 78.158.192.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2008 15:49:12 +0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: FW: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 Bjarke Viksoe wrote: > >> Vladimir wrote: >> I've noticed that right now, both -break-delete and -break-disable >> commands accept several breakpoint ids, like: >> -break-disable 1 2 3 >> This behaviour comes almost by accident, and is not documented >> anywhere. The question is -- should we document it and add tests, or >> should we declare this behaviour does not exist? I would disallow it. >> Keep it simple ;-) > > It's documented alright... > > -break-disable ( breakpoint )+ > > Notice the + character in the MI definition! Ok, we'll keep it then. > I'm using this behaviour. Other IDEs would be too, I'd imagine. For reference, which IDE are you using this behaviour in? - Volodya