From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22471 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2008 08:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22463 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jan 2008 08:15:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:14:40 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JKUZ6-0002Lc-8m for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:14:32 +0000 Received: from 77.246.241.246 ([77.246.241.246]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:14:32 +0000 Received: from ghost by 77.246.241.246 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:14:32 +0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: Our next GDB release (GDB version 6.8) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20080126005319.GD21874@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello GDB enthusiasts! > > The schedule on the GDB website shows that we were planning on > making a new GDB release (GDB version 6.8) soon: Branch creation > on Feb 5th, and a then an official release a month later. > Looks like it's going to be tight to make these dates, but > I don't think it's a problem. > > I would like us to start drawing a list of things that we'd like > to include in that release. For one, I'd like to list the changes > I submitted regarding Ada support, at least the ones that provide > the most value. Maybe I'll also find some time to work on something > we briefly discussed a few years back regarding the README file, and > maybe think about the NEWS file too. That's not critical though, > just making the release slightly more labor intensive. > > I propose we use a wiki page again. In fact, I was surprised to > see that someone already created one. Should I thank Nick for that? > > Opinions? Items that should be put on the list of things to finish > for the release? Please send them here and I'll add them to the > wiki. If a thread was already started, please post a link to it > as well. I would like these two patches to go in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00629.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00632.html They, together, fix a bug where gdb produces a totally bogus MI response. - Volodya