From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 4BXzL9+x01+HawAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:52:31 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C1D601F0A9; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:52:31 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4333F1E590 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:52:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10793973042; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:52:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F10793973042 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1607709151; bh=4ytS6JezxYX/3v+gIH0XGSJ/N5VX764GHcGrNIrxXMM=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=tBL+lF0NNduKJnMUu98j91UJIbvBLai99HVQnrUgkNFhQwHWZxsXbLnt1I5ZEr/+g AQvDjf64txVl5iwyDS11YWQ6zdy8b5OB4Xn2fqKNxWpeYRHEjJFkg+rsdgSPfl9Oht bhgLkSvjv6RKRLlS2C+2Yc90RYdHKGTXDJph4pMI= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9680397306C for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:52:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A9680397306C Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 0BBHqMu5010531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:52:27 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 0BBHqMu5010531 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CA041E590; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:52:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Proposal to Removal of QNX Neutrino support from GDB To: Stephen Webb , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <4205d383-e98e-f591-9031-f48925634c65@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:52:21 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:52:22 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 2020-12-11 12:31 p.m., Stephen Webb via Gdb wrote: >> If somebody would like the support for Neutrino to stay in GDB, please > > speak up. > > If so, we will need a maintainer to step up and become responsible to > > that port. > > We at QNX have opened discussions internally on this. Please hold off on > removal until at least the new year. Ok, thanks for the heads up. If you'd like to contribute upstream, please let us know if there's anything we can do to help. Simon