From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24958 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2009 18:43:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24950 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2009 18:43:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yx0-f190.google.com (HELO mail-yx0-f190.google.com) (209.85.210.190) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:43:35 +0000 Received: by yxe28 with SMTP id 28so1271970yxe.12 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:43:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.247.4 with SMTP id u4mr9271329anh.9.1245091411799; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA079763AC@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA079763AC@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MI register groups From: Chris Genly To: Marc Khouzam Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 Yes I saw that. Thanks. You are right that it would probably be easier. But I'd prefer to contribute to the Eclipse DSF project rather than having to apply patches to my source every time a new DSF is released. I'm hoping in the long run defining register groups in MI and providing patches to the DSF people will be less work. We'll see. I may regret it. :-) On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Marc Khouzam w= rote: >> -----Original Message----- > =A0/** > =A0* For the GDB GDBMI implementation there is only on group. The GPR and= FPU registers are grouped into > =A0* one set. We are going to hard wire this set as the "General Register= s". > =A0*/ > > And then everything about register groups is being done without using MI = or GDB. > If such an approach is sufficient for you, it would be much easier to get= done. > > Marc >