Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siva Velusamy" <siva.velusamy@gmail.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Ctrl+C when a watchpoint is set gdb
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7dfeff00711061832w3dddaafq2c71c07d367fac60@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

I'm trying to debug the following strange gdb behavior on an embedded target:

(gdb) watch foo
(gdb) c
(gdb)
Hardware watchpoint 2: foo

Old value = 0
New value = 10
call_func (a=<value optimized out>) at bar.c:4
4       }
(gdb) c
Continuing.
<--------------------- At this point Ctrl+C does not stop gdb.

What happens is that when a Ctrl+C is pressed, gdb receives control,
goes into infrun.c and checks if the processor has stopped due to an
existing breakpoint. (The only existing breakpoint is a watchpoint on
foo.)

However, the function bpstat_explains_signal is defined as follows:

breakpoint.h:547
/* Nonzero if a signal that we got in wait() was due to circumstances
   explained by the BS.  */
/* Currently that is true if we have hit a breakpoint, or if there is
   a watchpoint enabled.  */
#define bpstat_explains_signal(bs) ((bs) != NULL)

Since there is a watchpoint defined, this ends up evaluating to true,
even though this is a trap signal caused by Ctrl+C. Eventually, this
leads to keep_going(ecs) being called.

In cases where a watchpoint is not defined, then ecs->random_signal
ends up being 1, and gdb gives control back to the user.

This happens for two cpu targets: powerpc 405 and MicroBlaze.

Could someone point me in the right direction as to what exactly to
look for? The PowerPC target is pretty much unmodified gdb-6.5, so I'm
surprised that doesn't work.

Thanks!

-- 
In the end, everything is a gag.
           Charlie Chaplin


             reply	other threads:[~2007-11-07  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-07  2:32 Siva Velusamy [this message]
2007-11-07  2:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-07  2:48   ` Siva Velusamy
2007-11-07  2:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7dfeff00711061832w3dddaafq2c71c07d367fac60@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=siva.velusamy@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox