Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 8.1 build error
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e687057d79e17944e9a77912fd22bac0@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c744d369-801b-c29f-dd3d-961c57ebec74@redhat.com>

On 2018-04-27 15:08, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Oh, wait....  Your build line has no "-W" at all, it has "-w" instead??
> How did that happen?

When --disable-build-warnings is used, we don't put any -W/-Wno- flags:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/warning.m4;h=f176a3291aa68acf0122609531abb4652425525b;hb=HEAD#l62

> Right, that's ill-formed, thus a gdb bug.  A const POD must either
> be initialized, or have a user-declared default constructor.
> 
> So adding an explicit initializer like clang is suggesting should fix 
> it:
> 
>   const any_static_probe_ops any_static_probe_ops = {};

In the stackoverflow answer I pointed to in my other messages talks 
about a defect in the standard that was fixed. And it seems like the 
compilers aligned with the new behavior.  So is it really a GDB bug?  In 
any case, I have no problem adding the explicit initialization to be 
friendly with older compilers.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-27 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-27 18:02 Paul Koning
2018-04-27 18:38 ` Simon Marchi
2018-04-27 18:57   ` Paul Koning
2018-04-27 19:01     ` Paul Koning
2018-04-27 19:08     ` Simon Marchi
2018-04-27 19:18       ` Paul Koning
2018-04-27 20:41       ` Paul Koning
2018-04-27 19:10     ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-27 19:39       ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-04-27 20:00         ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-27 20:16         ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-27 20:24           ` Simon Marchi
2018-04-27 20:41             ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-27 20:48               ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-02  9:42                 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-02 10:13                   ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-27 19:10     ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e687057d79e17944e9a77912fd22bac0@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulkoning@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox