From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71844 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2016 18:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 71832 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2016 18:56:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:480 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 18:56:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336374E4D1; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u81IuihA028037; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:56:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Go C++ only To: Simon Marchi References: <212bc30a-e6ad-886b-0881-8206dd91b933@redhat.com> <410fa84696e520ca3845c841fc7391b8@simark.ca> <5479c5a0-a346-1718-5573-eeb4b19bc9db@redhat.com> <72276a8218ef0e667097dc3fb152c518@simark.ca> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 18:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <72276a8218ef0e667097dc3fb152c518@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 09/01/2016 07:33 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > > And to complete my answer on the original subject, I think it's fine to > wait until 7.12 is out before checking in anything that is C++-only. > The wait has been long already, a few weeks won't change much :). OTOH, there's most likely going to be a 7.12.1 too, so even though we can aim at avoiding major impact on backports, it's looking like the "7.12" milestone ends up being artificial. Thanks, Pedro Alves