From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-35582-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27094 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2009 13:24:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 27073 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2009 13:24:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:24:39 +0000
Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) 	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n8FDObqZ021211 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:24:37 -0700
Received: from yxe27 (yxe27.prod.google.com [10.190.2.27]) 	by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n8FDOYJ1006378 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:24:35 -0700
Received: by yxe27 with SMTP id 27so5200666yxe.10         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.131.5 with SMTP id e5mr12457382ybd.262.1253021074664; Tue,  	15 Sep 2009 06:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <77f815bd0909150619y7996f1a7lfdfc2e79bbd88b22@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77f815bd0909150619y7996f1a7lfdfc2e79bbd88b22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:24:00 -0000
Message-ID: <e394668d0909150624i2b407a2q35502a8a1ef89fd2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which version of binutils matches the BFD and Opcode in GDB6.8?
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: xingxing pan <forandom@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:19 AM, xingxing pan <forandom@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are the BFD and Opcode in GDB6.8 =A0from the binutils or developed
> separately from binutils?

Depends on what you mean by "separate". :-)

They do come from the same source tree, and so are not separate in
that sense, *but* they are released at different times, and so one
can't, technically, match bfd/opcodes from a binutils release with the
ones in a gdb release.