From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18825 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2008 19:18:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18763 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2008 19:18:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:18:22 +0000 Received: from spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id mACJIJUh019794 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18:19 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rvfc5.prod.google.com [10.140.180.5]) by spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id mACJI1Yd023754 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18:17 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so554252rvf.56 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.116.16 with SMTP id t16mr5047057rvm.250.1226517497253; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20081110144143.GB12962@caradoc.them.org> References: <4911CFB1.40006@oarcorp.com> <49148DF5.2060301@oarcorp.com> <20081107190039.GA25908@caradoc.them.org> <4914ABC8.7030908@oarcorp.com> <20081110144143.GB12962@caradoc.them.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Add SystemV IPC drivers to PSIM From: Doug Evans To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:06:19PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: >> Hi. Once upon a time I hacked in the sim tree. What kind of review >> is needed? I looked over the patch. It's pretty self-contained so >> the risk is pretty low, and I trust you. :-) > > If you're willing to be a sim reviewer, I bet we can get you listed > as one in record time - are you? I'm reluctant to approve patches to > code that I know pretty much nothing about. I'm not sure actually. On the one hand, sure, but on the other, while I realize sim patches are relatively rare, committing to something I often don't have time for is probably unfair to the community.