From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10609 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2008 19:44:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 10600 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2008 19:44:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:44:14 +0000 Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m77Ji9A9013217 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:44:09 +0100 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rvbk40.prod.google.com [10.140.87.40]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m77Ji7Ep027122 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:44:08 -0700 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1013804rvb.29 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.132.1 with SMTP id j1mr904058rvn.64.1218138247543; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.99.20 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:44:00 -0000 From: "Doug Evans" To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sol-thread.c core_ops oddity In-Reply-To: <20080807192518.GA31697@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080807191136.274F81C77BE@localhost> <20080807192518.GA31697@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:11:36PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote: >> Obviously I'm missing something. >> I don't have a solaris system to see what really happens, >> can someone fill in the missing piece that makes the above work? > > Luck and sorting. I'm pretty sure we generate the calls in > alphabetical order (by filename or by function, I'm not sure). Thanks. I don't see any sorting beyond INIT_FILES = $(COMMON_OBS) $(TSOBS) $(CONFIG_SRCS) and the hack for gdbtypes. Is there an intention to officially sanction the sorting as something one can take advantage of? I'd like to fix the misleading comments but it's not clear what better wording should be.