From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30626 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2008 19:45:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30615 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2008 19:45:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:45:13 +0000 Received: from zps19.corp.google.com (zps19.corp.google.com [172.25.146.19]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m1AJiNBg017018 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:44:23 -0800 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wafl35.prod.google.com [10.114.188.35]) by zps19.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m1AJiM6Q009684 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:44:23 -0800 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l35so1861496waf.12 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.154.1 with SMTP id b1mr8320484wae.34.1202672662216; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.13.5 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:44:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:45:00 -0000 From: "Doug Evans" To: "Vladimir Prus" , "Nick Roberts" , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Variable objects and STL containers In-Reply-To: <20080210175227.GA14127@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <18343.64413.689019.489727@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200802080946.28915.ghost@cs.msu.su> <18350.32064.844389.155290@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200802101010.49506.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20080210175227.GA14127@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 On Feb 10, 2008 9:52 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:10:48AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Please note that I already have proof-of-concept Python integration, > > together with code to use Python for -var-evaluate-expression, together > > with not-yet-working patch to dynamically compute the list of varobj children. > > It might be better to wait till I got the last bit done. > > Maybe you should put what you have out on a branch? > > Or if you're using svk for this maybe we can set up a scratch SVN > repository for it somewhere. That would be a good idea, I know some folks that would like to help work on this.