From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11700 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2007 15:34:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 11685 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2007 15:34:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:34:30 +0000 Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id lA2FYLFi031123 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 15:34:21 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ugg36.prod.google.com [10.66.7.36]) by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id lA2FYGUJ016290 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 36so789655ugg for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.184.17 with SMTP id h17mr769277ugf.1194017660069; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.242.13 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:34:00 -0000 From: "Douglas Evans" To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: dual-arch x86_64/i386 gdb for linux In-Reply-To: <20071102113232.GB16563@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071102113232.GB16563@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 On Nov 2, 2007 4:32 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:37:30PM -0700, Douglas Evans wrote: > > Hi. Are there any remaining issues for having one gdb binary support > > both x86_64 and i386 natively on linux? Several things seem to work, > > and for the things that don't work I'm not sure if it's pilot error or > > work that is still todo. > > Could you elaborate - what doesn't work? I'd expect everything to, > nowadays. There used to be trouble with libthread_db and > LinuxThreads, but NPTL's libthread_db should be fine. It was thread support. I'll try again with NPTL. Thanks.