From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30151 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2010 05:03:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29896 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2010 05:03:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pw0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f49.google.com) (209.85.160.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:03:09 +0000 Received: by pwj12 with SMTP id 12so3863767pwj.8 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:03:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.63.2 with SMTP id l2mr184794wfa.322.1263445388145; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:03:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100113111126.GA606@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <4B4B7231.6010001@vmware.com> <20100111205421.GA31228@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100113111126.GA606@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> From: Hui Zhu Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reverse Debugging Headaches To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Sean Soria , Michael Snyder , "gdb@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 I don't have myself git. My patch looks like get from git because I generate patch with quilt. :) I will try to make mthread support patch check-in in recent days. For archer, thanks a lot of told me about it. If I have a lot of off-trunk patch, I will try to use it. Best regards, Hui On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 19:11, Jan Kratochvil w= rote: > Hi Hui, > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:28:47 +0100, Hui Zhu wrote: >> The prec in cvs-head still doesn't support multi-thread inferior. >> We just have a series of patches to make prec support multi-thread >> inferior. You can get the link for it in >> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ProcessRecord > > ok, sorry I have not tracked it. > > Wouldn't you prefer to maintain the off-trunk patches in public Archer GI= T? > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ArcherBranchManagement > Or making your own GIT public with some merged branch there. > You are apparently already developing it in GIT yourself. > Please ignore me if it was already discussed before. > > > Thanks, > Jan >