From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10581 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2009 12:57:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10572 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2009 12:57:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f183.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f183.google.com) (209.85.222.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:57:09 +0000 Received: by pzk13 with SMTP id 13so3263790pzk.25 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:57:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.41 with SMTP id c41mr322424wfj.2.1255957028084; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:57:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4ADA4BD8.6080800@vmware.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FYI] tutorial for process record and reverse debugging To: Marc Khouzam Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 > But from reading the tutorial I see that it may be of interest in some si= tuations. > What bothers me though is that one must disable all breakpoints and then = re-enable > them. =A0This can be a bit of an annoyance, especially if some bps were a= lready disabled. > I got to wonder if this doesn't call for a new command; something like > "record live", which would take us to the end of the recording while not = needing the > user to deal with existing breakpoints. > > What do you think? > > Marc > Sorry Marc, I cannot understand it. Could you please tell me which status need "disable all breakpoints and then re-enable them"? Thanks, Hui