From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26950 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2009 01:44:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 26941 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2009 01:44:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f181.google.com) (209.85.222.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:44:34 +0000 Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so384547pzk.13 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:44:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.5.28 with SMTP id 28mr128855wfe.82.1251942273083; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:44:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <200909021516.n82FGlTf017321@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Hui Zhu Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does gdb can handle longjmp in i386 and amd64 now? To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 23:22, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Mark" =3D=3D Mark Kettenis writes: > > Mark> I think it was the fact that it requires GDB to dig into glibc > Mark> internals in combination with Ulrich Drepper no wanting to commit > Mark> keeping those internals consistent. > > Oh, yeah, I forgot about the randomness and confused the current > situation with a bug report I sent about gdb not working even with the > LD_POINTER_GUARD=3D0 case: > =A0 =A0http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9832 > > In that case I think we can safely teach gdb about the mangling. > In other cases, I don't know what to do. =A0Continue to lose, I guess. > > Tom > ...... Hui