From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14634 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2009 08:55:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 14623 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2009 08:55:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:15 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y8so1258927tia.12 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.57.6 with SMTP id f6mr2975736tia.11.1236675313193; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: line_num of gdb_disassembly From: teawater To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: gdb ml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 Thanks Tom, I had checked it in. Hui On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:50, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "teawater" =3D=3D teawater =A0 writes: > > teawater> I found that the argument line_num of gdb_disassembly isn't > teawater> used in anywhere. =A0So maybe I can remove it. > > Go for it. > > teawater> And it can be checked in under the obvious rule, right? > > IMO, yes. > > Tom >