From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5132 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2009 06:18:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5124 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2009 06:18:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:18:17 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y8so1171616tia.12 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:18:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.52.5 with SMTP id z5mr4153643tiz.6.1233987494653; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:18:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <029501c98854$2447b780$6cd72680$@com> References: <029501c98854$2447b780$6cd72680$@com> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reverse excecution and Simics testing: short report From: teawater To: Jakob Engblom Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 That is great! Thanks Jakob. Hui On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 20:12, Jakob Engblom wrote: > Hi! > > We have done some preliminary "smoke testing" at Virtutech to see how > gdb-main-branch revexec works with our old proven revexec engine. The res= ults > are quite encouraging. > > Simple testing using gdb-remote to talk to Simics, with Power Architectur= e and > ARM targets appears to work. What worked in our specially-patched gdb-6.8 > version now works with gdb-trunk. We can stop and reverse and step etc. > Essentially, this indicates that the reverse execution core support is OK. > > We also tested using MI commands to drive reverse execution. We used gdb-= trunk > plus our proposed MI commands, and the only problem we ran into seems to = be the > same reverse-finish (or preferably, uncall) operation that Teawater and M= arc > have been reporting. Once again, the system seems to be working fine over= all. > > Best regards, > > /jakob > > _______________________________________________________ > > Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager > > Virtutech Direct: +46 8 690 07 47 > Drottningholmsv=E4gen 22 Mobile: +46 709 242 646 > 11243 Stockholm Web: www.virtutech.com > Sweden > ________________________________________________________ > > > >