From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30239 invoked by alias); 19 May 2006 01:41:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 30231 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2006 01:41:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.236) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 01:41:09 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so549585wra for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 18:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.180.14 with SMTP id c14mr1016074qbf; Thu, 18 May 2006 18:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.163.9 with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 18:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 02:33:00 -0000 From: teawater To: teawater , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB remote user interface 0.0.0 release In-Reply-To: <20060518215555.GA18245@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060518215555.GA18245@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 GDB/MI is good interface. But I think it's not very easy to support. Sometimes, the coder only need a interface that can send some command to GDB & get the return. I think support GDBRUI is easy. teawater 2006/5/19, Daniel Jacobowitz : > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:59:31PM +0800, teawater wrote: > > How do you think about it? > > I don't understand why you needed it. Why is this better than talking > the existing GDB/MI protocol over a pipe? > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > CodeSourcery >