From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 9FgNDGxvNmRUgCkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:44:28 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 258F71E221; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:44:28 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=a9l619Qa; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A131E0D2 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:44:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4033858413 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:44:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1F4033858413 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1681289067; bh=6Fjb8TEi7b5BJonN9DLj+TsPFWkM8noPyfyUGQbVEsk=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=a9l619QaA4wWwnFLlYBJUAL7i/9fciS1uu7qejyitY0lN8+46YdCGcKrJRNDbjO3n SaBhFNBhf53bs/I8goGmFsoJ8Qp5rLvuxuAfqZxtrZpu/UeLvgG12lEOmw7BYmfDRl dtq0a+IB77kpSNN/5Cx2V1m3By8dwgd4h+yBiBr4= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA68D3858D39 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:43:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EA68D3858D39 Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-660-WaIC8fWxMfmXxAxGoZAKJA-1; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:43:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WaIC8fWxMfmXxAxGoZAKJA-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id o14-20020a0cc38e000000b005e62747d93aso8396469qvi.11 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:43:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681289002; x=1683881002; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:content-language :references:cc:to:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6Fjb8TEi7b5BJonN9DLj+TsPFWkM8noPyfyUGQbVEsk=; b=P+OjRvt0TF/WyGbwy8I8bdRFh6q4UtnckVXSzjmKU4RX6v96D36VzOSLBCXP4OcKbx Sy/VNoHSxHrdi/Q38y+UJaIZ/xbVlyPNTgobGVta7zZOYSRLxzQcH5kjl1t43vAmXDd+ J6Gjut3cfNRStIAnN0OO6EpHW5LQohWo6h/hv0+/x8hgzA4hBZ+txzFbKA7SHb8wPDnY C12JGELCeaEuUSvJyLUZr2OjGN5NsGqiTWsQAXTd2ctmnTLIFME/s1oFOmxrQrgF9q++ RRLOpB6MHNx/NkgbP5KcQuM93iOLcwf/NL5oX10H6UZewWznl7RWv6JQoOPb/hWcB+iA apnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fVlVglT73lIWXlv9YTVqlv+l0YsrIKtJWrhgRoObzVXxxe0MRO fYAdMLJKo44mh05U9HoZmBeTyk/Ah6Tz08bzf46wqMn08ZVms6xnlow/jhvbxnwlUAdECZgdU7+ xb6HrSvW7NSI= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f05:0:b0:3b9:8885:296f with SMTP id f5-20020ac87f05000000b003b98885296fmr8194327qtk.24.1681289002098; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:43:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZJNIIKpQzTIZqHM1WjTe1McIQDMkm/45dcxlbKacnYve9Y0MLSUQ2wOJrhA4KmWI3igy8UuQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f05:0:b0:3b9:8885:296f with SMTP id f5-20020ac87f05000000b003b98885296fmr8194316qtk.24.1681289001839; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([79.123.86.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 132-20020a37068a000000b0074868aed8easm4517838qkg.71.2023.04.12.01.43.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:43:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 To: "J.W. Jagersma" , Eli Zaretskii Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <1c38b926-e003-0e21-e7f1-3d5dbec2aabf@redhat.com> <838rf4ou73.fsf@gnu.org> <03bbbbff-5bcc-3fa8-a5e9-9b9cbd541f06@simark.ca> <83cz4aa2h7.fsf@gnu.org> <996c6efd-a1ef-80c5-9294-6732a0a089db@gmail.com> Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils In-Reply-To: <996c6efd-a1ef-80c5-9294-6732a0a089db@gmail.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Nick Clifton via Gdb Reply-To: Nick Clifton Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi Guys, > For consistency though, I'd suggest to not use any file extension at all. None > of the top-level text files currently have an extension. Except that I think that there is an expectation that the file will have an extension. For example see this wikipedia article in favour of security.txt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security.txt Then again, repositories like github seem to prefer a security.md file: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/getting-started/adding-a-security-policy-to-your-repository I think that there are web crawlers out there that look for this type of document and can handle either extension. But I am not sure if they will work with no extension at all. Cheers Nick