From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mcjRCRl422icYhkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 02:26:33 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Ui1WbZ9c; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 186981E047; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 02:26:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F038B1E047 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 02:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8593857C6C for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 06:26:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A8593857C6C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1759213591; bh=aNc4jNuJY6hB6zNAB+4eNBlz75tu5NkxTFMu61ycbWM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=Ui1WbZ9cq3/iun/ikIgqs1p5bbBxnahiTwBYAwqI2481hy4sR4Xx5/v7wbiCf224i hRb2OdMf5ADO06RCYgKzgI+h3F6PP9xMrHvO+rFjsKD91YogClTT7hQWE+oh3pzmcn 7eBbqOhiK1OHBlAD0U+eIH2TvbIFikG37hvZLbLg= Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C6D3858D20 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 06:25:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 05C6D3858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 05C6D3858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759213539; cv=none; b=BtXBKnwu5zIfsMH0qD2GgFrlenZvuPWOBSy/3w55jl2DS2YEXptXfwm6mbDFm6FhRDJG1LJsKybPl5jNLX9SMv3yY3rX37nnH6MT4rfmO5Lm3O1CZBW9CMBGvC8a47FnlT5EdGCOgh4ZOgk5zz+hBH55gfkHaO94ktCfsGFZp0g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759213539; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kWTLE7Bck7whcBc+RRnhgm538arZYGTifBMS/BopWvA=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=GI6jmc3iZ/e4Ojh7EydSEsg4eyKrtuv+VabNTCAZ0ZcuK0z+Tg/LujdOir+UIc6dbjn0WIkJmzXkFGZYKPjdWe8QwUlsA2k7ENjHlxfzcqXSXKCnV7LcryBB00Zcu/R3llk5wCj/X0MPcScl2rVKCU0z9rSsjtcr4BYxfLlHO38= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05C6D3858D20 Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-46e52279279so13871825e9.3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 23:25:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759213538; x=1759818338; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aNc4jNuJY6hB6zNAB+4eNBlz75tu5NkxTFMu61ycbWM=; b=SqlMWtT5hiy6O4mRtNNvjhwYm+7B2pL/ouUWQrhnaBus1QyF4tn4cEBAnHFhz8M84k W7hk2nm2bIQCL97Y8tRzPsbUntF31LCO07LXL7CslzxoD29T9F0rh1+EUt91+TqyvYcm 3V+PaXzAVOwDpyZYYYzVCq5Q5WJwTW9XTJ2TeapknER+fu63zyMcUxxXjLWxNAU9fKpl 4WYY7CiwzjcwKWNXwDc1qORwJucAzWdlR6ynfhJssyVeLMILdeDm/L0TsrYx7dDaV99E oB9vcS+OPHrQgv6ve9dRRHeStyf7nEH4aCwNAHbY4+Pj/HGs2TjcDTnsZoQPDfJINk0X bBog== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUPsr0UDmcvenRT4srosNQFPxsulzp+IkuN8e81lPgqjQMzPEu5bGPhpEYCRty4hRhZO/U=@sourceware.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx93EmVtSTgY0SHfIsvPE3ZsJ3Nf78oAghMRAzKgs/uGtE+9QY1 OlX+ZsCUXyVK80h7GKeRDZ+5KdT6N49w2tgxY8vwsnjnzPP2kz6aBPm0 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuD60OPnOro2P+yFZopLT/xRpyc1WYjbfUrenXWMTsUdI5mUuTabhQfeTknE4H 8IpIYpxu64CpMqt5BeN04WhUdbzidVD00okjP6OaDtH2AkopE8EI+TzWkWnXW4NKom+H8r1tpLa OuZOg44d/uhgtSbSD9eP3PoKOXhagu10VX7nrCrx025g8JzFOl5WgJrtgb9m9ndNqIE9wo3NffN 9PMbv94hQ1NCwOrVJrktBh9YjXimWhA1blg2ePgHeWamTN4a1bSTyDzfreYoGPZm9aD9Klof1KH OIrGkHGPufAQ0h0Ufs00E5q7f2BhSOe98Ii+wYWuSZwEZK4DsZs7zUR4oQpaeNpW9D9hjF1zLnf OZtv/P4U1RNrKQE1iMzIcqwPmCj/wsDak3e29nIsD5fvI2ZmR9J/Fig+LLaU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH4+uJw+eJH/BqX/LVrxz6/Qa5/2awT0UHEt9o065K8FEG4AqtFH7w5F3anuCfL3BH43zJzPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:81e:b0:46e:1a14:a81b with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-46e32a1a396mr109376235e9.36.1759213537463; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 23:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.38] ([86.12.216.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-46e42eee0b6sm144017225e9.10.2025.09.29.23.25.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2025 23:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:25:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bugzilla keyword for beginner issues to work on To: Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: guinevere@redhat.com References: Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Luis via Gdb Reply-To: Luis Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 29/09/2025 21:07, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Hi all, > As talked about during the GNU tools cauldron, the gdb and gcc > keywords usage here are different but folks mentioned it would be a > good idea to have the same between the 2 bugzilla instances. Right now > gcc is easyhack while gdb uses good-first-bug. Both have issues with > the naming of each. > So I was thinking of a good name and came up with beginner-improvement . > > I know this is all bikeshedding but in this case since the 2 projects > right now use different naming we have a good chance to come up with a > good name in the first place. > beginner-improvement has a few advantages, first it is about being a > beginner to the project. How long someone can be a beginner is up to > them; it does not need to be their first issue solving. And the idea > of an issue being easy is also left behind; some of them might not > actually be "easy" but a beginner can still solve it. > Plus in many cases it is not exactly a bug but rather than an > improvement that needs to be done so this new name removes that side > of things. > > > So in summary, beginner-improvement is my proposal for the new keyword. > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski Personally I'm fine with beginner-improvement. Would we need to go hunting for the old names to do the mass updates?