From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-32768-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30522 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2008 07:43:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 30510 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2008 07:43:16 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:42:25 +0000
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so273807wfc.24         for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.255.14 with SMTP id c14mr352488wfi.296.1218094943733;         Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.13.10 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d557d0790808070042w6783e68bv8de47a62a41a4891@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:43:00 -0000
From: "Eran Ifrah" <eran.ifrah@gmail.com>
To: "Nick Roberts" <nickrob@snap.net.nz>, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Manipulating memory
In-Reply-To: <18586.41219.18256.847372@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d557d0790808051203o4f157ae6k44915ab3b2ae91b5@mail.gmail.com> 	 <200808060838.41498.apoenitz@trolltech.com> 	 <18585.23939.96967.991555@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> 	 <d557d0790808060122x67edceb8h559caa8d2670316b@mail.gmail.com> 	 <18586.41219.18256.847372@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> wrote:
>  > > GDB has an undocumented MI command called -data-write-memory.  I've not
>  > > used it though, and don't know if it works or does what you want.
>  > >
>  >
>  > Thanks ! this is exactly what I was looking for: the sibling function
>  > of -data-read-memory.
>  >
>  > Any ideas why this command is undocumented?
>
> Not really.  If it works for you, perhaps you could documentation.
I was not referring to the actual documentation, but maybe there is a
reason for that? unsupported?

But, I will document it once I will explore all its options.

>
> --
> Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
>

-- 
Eran Ifrah
eran.ifrah@gmail.com