From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id G+DAE+/8+mUz/g4AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:12:47 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Pn6EPGbO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3F3701E0BB; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:12:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 262471E030 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:12:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D3C385841E for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:12:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2D3C385841E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1710947564; bh=nWweYlR8HschiGnAXzfLS5KJMUEfGAKqcDoGDmpeK9c=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=Pn6EPGbO4OCIxVcU1c3tQsaLTAddYmwO1wSYcLRBfjylOHunbCJm7lF76buU7gryg XH6U1VhfezsoJVa3vMKtus4b83U4d2WPn62e16+k7/1YqQjiG9FtrRrjw7qjDQGHrk 782ZgGF4CaoqjHTGpZS0c0sJk7wU+4p6dnTHMycE= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAFAD3858CDB; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:11:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BAFAD3858CDB ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BAFAD3858CDB ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710947476; cv=none; b=YYC5T1pRm9s9QIFcv8IBHrT3eIhWFSkmkY5U7HdMaLxvWAzNdZlhTvSZ+O8fsU1BoqJWdyEZxuCQOu2KtNfzblvucMtXgCVAhfc91sDI9ZgKqypiI9kYFvOFF1CNz69t48ZtFqZCxG+9jK1OdYPZzoX5TPz0lXiaDHCyEZ+UGs8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710947476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nWweYlR8HschiGnAXzfLS5KJMUEfGAKqcDoGDmpeK9c=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=G2KdOpe3NELu7IX6TFpN+xs8841Hgrb6/To+jw1RtzB8KQvZhHOnnAJXAnJ8ObXU0p/lZ1hwB9BZ/c7goNQSlA74gz1CfMh3VJxTMCghN/iFzO+na7zcJHKFTc1jP6GL8C3tPGD2iOqbQQft+tuUok9qW9xbeG84MUlaUCiATJI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38CB81E030; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:11:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:11:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC] add regenerate Makefile target To: Christophe Lyon , Tom Tromey Cc: Eric Gallager , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20240313080237.1143034-1-christophe.lyon@linaro.org> <1eb529f2-3842-4090-a8e2-f713a28f2394@simark.ca> <87edcbk1x3.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 3/18/24 13:28, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote: > I'm not up-to-date with gdb's policy about patches: are they supposed > to be posted with or without the regenerated parts included? > IIUC they are not included in patch submissions for binutils and gcc, > which makes the pre-commit CI miss some patches. We post the patches with the regenerated parts. Simon