From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29705 invoked by alias); 10 May 2012 17:38:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 29629 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2012 17:38:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from poczta.oswiecenia.net (HELO poczta.oswiecenia.net) (83.13.108.61) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:37:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.oswiecenia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39353BDB46; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:37:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from poczta.oswiecenia.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (poczta.oswiecenia.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBafxZ4c5MMY; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:37:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from poczta.oswiecenia.net (unknown [192.168.5.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.oswiecenia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 309373BDB3D; Thu, 10 May 2012 19:37:44 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:38:00 -0000 From: Tomasz Grobelny To: Tom Tromey Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , Subject: Re: sun compiler and gdb In-Reply-To: <4eaa53078c18227995efd9409baaf5eb@192.168.5.248> References: <25b0084e43f4d35410c8dff55a3be61d@192.168.5.248> <543302446b67dbf68e8cedb69a197d77@192.168.5.248> <871umtrtab.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87havoqhxm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4eaa53078c18227995efd9409baaf5eb@192.168.5.248> Message-ID: X-Sender: tomasz@grobelny.oswiecenia.net User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On Thu, 10 May 2012 18:37:41 +0200, Tomasz Grobelny wrote: > Actually the behaviour on the two machines I have tested on is different. > Not yet sure whether this is a problem with compiler architecture (x86 vs > sparc) or gdb version (7.4.1 vs. 7.0.1), but it looks like this on > sparc/gdb 7.0.1: > It turned out to be a difference between gdb versions. Does there exist any tool that would let me throw out those offending sections from the executable file? -- Regards, Tomasz Grobelny