From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4310 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2009 20:41:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 4295 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Apr 2009 20:41:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qy0-f115.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f115.google.com) (209.85.221.115) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:41:40 +0000 Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so560836qyk.12 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:41:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.76.1 with SMTP id a1mr4059458vck.101.1238618497286; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:41:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090401203824.GA23715@caradoc.them.org> References: <20090401203824.GA23715@caradoc.them.org> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ARM VFP support From: Matt Fischer To: Matt Fischer , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Ah, fantastic. Thanks for the information. --Matt On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:25:46PM -0500, Matt Fischer wrote: >> Has anyone yet attempted to add VFP support to GDB, now that the >> kernel support for it exists? I'm considering trying to hack in at >> least some basic register viewing support to assist in my debugging >> here, but if somebody happens to already have a work-in-progress of >> this I'd be interested in seeing it. > > CodeSourcery was working with ARM on this (way too long-standing) > limitation; that led to the ptrace patch and to GDB support. > > The GDB work is in the latest Sourcery G++ releases, which does not > necessarily do you any good... it will be in Lite in a couple of weeks > too. We're not sitting on it intentionally; I just haven't had time > to separate out the patch for submission yet. Hassle me about it if > you don't hear about this again in the next couple weeks. > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > CodeSourcery >