Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Antipov <dantipov@nvidia.com>, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Ryan Bissell <rbissell@nvidia.com>,
	Mikhail Filimonov <mfilimonov@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: Host GDB disconnect while waiting for tracee status change
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 15:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc13aee2-f204-95f9-bdfd-84262017ee3c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8a36a11-77a0-a203-0b8a-6465cbed7053@nvidia.com>

On 08/23/2017 02:55 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On 08/23/2017 04:10 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>> Right, because in non-stop mode, linux-low.c doesn't
>> usually block inside mywait....sigsuspend.  See server.c:resume.
>> In non-stop mode, gdbserver waits for both socket events and
>> target events at the same time in the event loop.  The
>> non-stop variant of the RSP is asynchronous.
> 
> Thanks. So, is it mandatory to use non-stop mode if I want to be able to
> restart gdb without loosing the debugging session controlled by gdbserver?

In all-stop/sync mode, you can only exit gdb if the
target is stopped, in which case you can't get into the
problem case.  If you're considering "restarting gdb" manually,
then no.  This is about the server robustly handling the case of
the connection unexpectedly closing, like GDB crashing.
And gdbserver could be fixed, somehow.  This is a quality of
implementation issue, not a fundamental insurmountable design
problem.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


      reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-22 13:23 Dmitry Antipov
2017-08-23  8:18 ` Yao Qi
2017-08-23  9:37   ` Dmitry Antipov
2017-08-23 13:10     ` Pedro Alves
2017-08-23 13:56       ` Dmitry Antipov
2017-08-23 15:01         ` Pedro Alves [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc13aee2-f204-95f9-bdfd-84262017ee3c@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=dantipov@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mfilimonov@nvidia.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=rbissell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox