From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31602 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2007 17:36:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 31593 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2007 17:36:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.236) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:36:07 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so221674nzc for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:36:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.111.1 with SMTP id o1mr1441044wam.1195061764171; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:36:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.95.9 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:36:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:36:00 -0000 From: "Rob Quill" To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Removing deprecated breakpoint functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 Hi, I am trying to figure out how to remove deprecated_insert/remove_raw_breakpoint and was wondering if it is acceptable to substitute a call to them with a call to the break_command() function as this will handle all the breakpoint chain related things, or is this function too high level and another one should be used? Thanks for your help. Rob