From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id TO0IE3CB01/dZQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:25:52 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4127F1F0A9; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:25:52 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87EDD1E552 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:25:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F40C385480A; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:25:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F40C385480A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1607696751; bh=b5WkgBeVT01gXGgnizJb1x1ae3Hgc0kkANpaQUGt88I=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=OvRLReC7AwL1mm6o2oIx8D9sVCtoOiID25fDlNznb8e8e8lF501wnrPPQwl44oom4 jkMIyldvXVJq8IjT3TImd7cmVs5iJzQj61bucDUpedUKjGC+l1Cqix/vI8ORHrKLOY vlTzpZvR9QuiZLFtrW8NtWZxi51Uc/qLmi2ITfVQ= Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5193B385480A for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:25:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5193B385480A Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id 143so8507338qke.10 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 06:25:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b5WkgBeVT01gXGgnizJb1x1ae3Hgc0kkANpaQUGt88I=; b=YFH1C11e1pXCVwXSCuedGCTxZU5kVcvq0FPgGhjXBuFixiKpHdty4YrVT/mt0gCFqe c/09c+PfQ0ZRJOkWSJKmXEUb3oFdzR7N0KCF8YCAg8Q4rJBjmJnmmDOossT1U9+N00HQ gMn8sd8hsmMtg/Cv+BWqJJspZMJtphBK3PEfeqaCCiKe6KMaL37zSFO81f+LiQyU8B7n 4lxCcaQMRO7PEI+Kv4bZlhfn3tuStIG+Qt2XKrtN+LHaBHxLyOePW1gCKpBg2F8utMAw 5x0bSlia1D6BTI2+PmZtfE+ys0XrfoV82tj+T5nTVP63MDo+6rQc1Do7jNo2xdaFIU2g ZQOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zuGBcJgKPiqXVB60187AHjqVCrE9ytJnFNK5M8BUhoHGVf/3m 08KFWRk2/H+pAigQtVo7kPmBQw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsbPTFw3WKvahSAvtBBGX9JEmeLb9R8Ls3ycW10zwl+axTiVoooUqT4EkeBHFvNUHWhsv6kA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:9b04:: with SMTP id d4mr16534593qke.408.1607696747905; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 06:25:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:7f0:8284:370e:756b:7fd0:a7db:2c0d? ([2804:7f0:8284:370e:756b:7fd0:a7db:2c0d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5sm6999781qkc.93.2020.12.11.06.25.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 06:25:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Do we still support DICOS? To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Benedek?= , "gdb@sourceware.org" , Simon Marchi References: Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:25:44 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Luis Machado via Gdb Reply-To: Luis Machado Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi, On 12/11/20 6:34 AM, László Benedek wrote: > Hi all, > > I am an Ericsson engineer working on a product that is the next version > in the evolution of Dicos. This GDB support is still actively used in > our products in Ericsson. > If it is possible please do not remove it from GDB. > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Laszlo Benedek > Ericsson > > p.s.: I am not a subscriber on the gdb mail list, I was notified about > this discussion. If you'd like to answer please cc me directly. Thanks for the update. It would be nice to have someone step up and be a maintainer of the "port" then, otherwise I think this question will be raised again in a couple years. If we have a name we can get in touch with, it makes it easier for us to verify the status of the code and prevent unwanted removals.