Re: GDB and scripting languages - which

Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-14T18:24:17Z

> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:00:14 -0500
> From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
> CC: jimb@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:01:39 -0500
> >> From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
> >> CC: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
> >>
> >> that's really pure FUD
> >
> > Thanks, this kind of attitude really helps to facilitate free
> > expression of opinions on this list.
>
> Well my use of the term FUD here was
> considered. You were arguing that Python would
> introduce excessive overhead

I was arguing that features like networking, graphics, and GUI,
mentioned by Jim as an argument for Python's better suitability (or so
I understood), would be excessive overhead in the GDB scripting
language.

Maybe in the future you should consider a possibility that you
misunderstand what is written, _before_ you consider throwing the term
FUD at your opponents.