From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id tRMSF4Wc8mY3oDUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:03:33 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3E11A1E353; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:03:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID, BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4389F1E05C for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:03:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE71385DDFA for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:03:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8C93858D26 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:03:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CF8C93858D26 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orcam.me.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orcam.me.uk ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org CF8C93858D26 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:4190:8020::34 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1727175787; cv=none; b=wnGnM9usXNx0y0Uo2uUPZW2cjl0vjLRe56qsiGfSclUBf34huY6GlOHrqPFw+5b9zwGYh5WifdlbdqUiTFR1JdetwCi96DpI8qbB3Wb0ZBPt3tRvISzocc0j4UzbVcrjGnwDF9+bzS+4mIR/PMhfimehJ/HqyC+b4Bjrbj+kORg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1727175787; c=relaxed/simple; bh=StFXT7r2cQpPAAeQhgScBrYXyea7r90R8VIuk29HKfs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=MIfETev1hdb6hCXqyAfsfcdZ1YcaSbHqCBTDWRGqNGZoyfNaSv4gcDd5XvgAF1V2fJTD/dm4M3UD3TOjPKMJX9EZr0CI3Hqn2HenZwZUQP8zwqHAX97V1RURx3jCTn30LEILAYMDcdUolkwl/VAwuq2FyZ1JNdbFOoyZEdh/mrM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0A1D692009C; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0505392009B; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:03:02 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:03:02 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" cc: Nick Clifton , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: RFC: Deprecate the ARM simulator In-Reply-To: <7f447b75-b472-477f-9ab2-e0b0f17d03f3@arm.com> Message-ID: References: <7f447b75-b472-477f-9ab2-e0b0f17d03f3@arm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gdb wrote: > Won't this break builds for arm users unless they now explicitly specify > --disable-sim? That's a bit aggressive, IMO, and might cause problems for > multi-target builds that want some sims, if available. We don't want to make > life harder for those just trying to build gdb. ISTM this change needs to be combined with one to add sim to noconfigdirs at the top level for arm*-*-* targets unless --enable-sim has been also explicitly given. There's previous art for such an arrangement in AFAICS. Maciej