Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
To: Christopher Bainbridge <cb0128@my.bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [help] Issues with 'g' packet and MIPS - gdb interprets the packet reply wrong
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1410212110290.7896@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54464055.9020100@my.bristol.ac.uk>

Hi Christopher,

> I am trying to implement a remote stub for a MIPS cpu (using GDB version 7.8).
> When GDB asks for the general registers using  the 'g' packet, I reply with:
> 
> 00000000000000000d01000000000000fffdffff00000000000000000080c0bf30000000f0fec0bf000000002e0000000000000000000000000000008080808000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001800000000000000000e8fec0bf00000000702ec0bf0000000000000000000000000000000000000000702ec0bf
> 
> As each register is 32 bits (represented by 8 hex characters), this should be
> all the registers up to and including the PC.

 What makes you assume the registers are 32 bits each?

> However, GDB prints this out:
> 
> info reg
>           zero       at       v0       v1       a0       a1 a2       a3
>  R0   00000000 0000010d fffffdff 00000000 00000030 00000000 00000000 00000000
>             t0       t1       t2       t3       t4       t5 t6       t7
>  R8   00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 80010000 00000000 00000000
>             s0       s1       s2       s3       s4       s5 s6       s7
> Sending packet: $p13#d4...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p14#d5...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p15#d6...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p16#d7...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p17#d8...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
>  R16  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>             t8       t9       k0       k1       gp       sp s8       ra
> Sending packet: $p18#d9...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p19#da...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p1a#02...Ack
> Packet received: 00000180
> Sending packet: $p1b#03...Ack
> 
> etc
> 
> This looks to be that it is determining the size of each register incorrectly,
> and is thus asking for more registers using the 'p' packet.
> 
> Is this a bug on my end or in GDB?
> I use the command
> 
> set processor mips:14000
> 
> beforehand, as this is the processor we're using.

 You mean:

(gdb) set architecture mips:14000

I presume, right?

 The R14000 is a 64-bit processor so its registers are 64-bit and will be 
treated as such by default by GDB.  You may be able to limit the width of 
registers expected by selecting a 32-bit processor instead or by selecting 
a 32-bit ABI such as `o32'.  The latter can be done with:

(gdb) set mips abi o32

or by selecting a file to debug that has been built for that ABI.

 Please note that this is a grey area though, with a bare-metal stub you 
should be really exchanging registers with GDB in their native sizes and 
letting GDB truncate and extend them as required depending on the ABI used 
by the program being debugged.  GDB is already capable of doing that, 
however in order to make use of that capability both the stub and GDB 
would have to support XML register descriptions which is something that 
owing to the vast number of CP0 register set variants in the MIPS 
architecture has never been implemented.  So in fact you may be hitting 
problems regardless of the ABI selection noted above.

 You can always determine the widths of registers GDB expects with the:

(gdb) maintenance print registers

command -- see the `Type' column on the right for the internal type used 
and note that the registers exchanged with a remote stub are those in the 
low half of indices (`Nr' == `Rel'), the so called "raw registers".

 HTH,

  Maciej


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-21 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21 11:15 Christopher Bainbridge
2014-10-21 20:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2014-10-22 10:31   ` Christopher Bainbridge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.1410212110290.7896@tp.orcam.me.uk \
    --to=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=cb0128@my.bristol.ac.uk \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox