From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
To: Christopher Bainbridge <cb0128@my.bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [help] Issues with 'g' packet and MIPS - gdb interprets the packet reply wrong
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1410212110290.7896@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54464055.9020100@my.bristol.ac.uk>
Hi Christopher,
> I am trying to implement a remote stub for a MIPS cpu (using GDB version 7.8).
> When GDB asks for the general registers using the 'g' packet, I reply with:
>
> 00000000000000000d01000000000000fffdffff00000000000000000080c0bf30000000f0fec0bf000000002e0000000000000000000000000000008080808000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001800000000000000000e8fec0bf00000000702ec0bf0000000000000000000000000000000000000000702ec0bf
>
> As each register is 32 bits (represented by 8 hex characters), this should be
> all the registers up to and including the PC.
What makes you assume the registers are 32 bits each?
> However, GDB prints this out:
>
> info reg
> zero at v0 v1 a0 a1 a2 a3
> R0 00000000 0000010d fffffdff 00000000 00000030 00000000 00000000 00000000
> t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7
> R8 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 80010000 00000000 00000000
> s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6 s7
> Sending packet: $p13#d4...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p14#d5...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p15#d6...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p16#d7...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p17#d8...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> R16 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> t8 t9 k0 k1 gp sp s8 ra
> Sending packet: $p18#d9...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p19#da...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000
> Sending packet: $p1a#02...Ack
> Packet received: 00000180
> Sending packet: $p1b#03...Ack
>
> etc
>
> This looks to be that it is determining the size of each register incorrectly,
> and is thus asking for more registers using the 'p' packet.
>
> Is this a bug on my end or in GDB?
> I use the command
>
> set processor mips:14000
>
> beforehand, as this is the processor we're using.
You mean:
(gdb) set architecture mips:14000
I presume, right?
The R14000 is a 64-bit processor so its registers are 64-bit and will be
treated as such by default by GDB. You may be able to limit the width of
registers expected by selecting a 32-bit processor instead or by selecting
a 32-bit ABI such as `o32'. The latter can be done with:
(gdb) set mips abi o32
or by selecting a file to debug that has been built for that ABI.
Please note that this is a grey area though, with a bare-metal stub you
should be really exchanging registers with GDB in their native sizes and
letting GDB truncate and extend them as required depending on the ABI used
by the program being debugged. GDB is already capable of doing that,
however in order to make use of that capability both the stub and GDB
would have to support XML register descriptions which is something that
owing to the vast number of CP0 register set variants in the MIPS
architecture has never been implemented. So in fact you may be hitting
problems regardless of the ABI selection noted above.
You can always determine the widths of registers GDB expects with the:
(gdb) maintenance print registers
command -- see the `Type' column on the right for the internal type used
and note that the registers exchanged with a remote stub are those in the
low half of indices (`Nr' == `Rel'), the so called "raw registers".
HTH,
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 11:15 Christopher Bainbridge
2014-10-21 20:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2014-10-22 10:31 ` Christopher Bainbridge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.1410212110290.7896@tp.orcam.me.uk \
--to=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=cb0128@my.bristol.ac.uk \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox