From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10820 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2018 15:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10798 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2018 15:31:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:431 X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:31:21 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9TFVEYW001679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:31:19 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 815CA1EA6F; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:31:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D971E514; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:31:13 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:31:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Cc: Bill Morgan , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: win32-arm-low.c regptr 96 bits stored in 32 bit variable In-Reply-To: <63e27524-6e86-eae2-8cd7-4482f5cda5a4@arm.com> References: <63e27524-6e86-eae2-8cd7-4482f5cda5a4@arm.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On 2018-10-29 09:50, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > Surely nobody is interested in the long-dead FPA architecture these > days. I'm not sure why GDB still supports it. If it's really useless to support it today and it's just dead weight, it would be ideal if somebody from ARM (that has the full picture of the situation) made a patch to remove it. Thanks, Simon