Re: Virtual Machine and GDB

["Cai Qian" <caiqian@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On 8/21/06, Michael Snyder <Michael.Snyder@palmsource.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 18:59 +0100, Cai Qian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 8/21/06, Neo <cjia@cse.unl.edu> wrote:
> > > Cai,
> > >
> > > I am wondering why you need to debug the VM remotely. Maybe you have
> > > your own requirements, such as for embedded systems. But I think you
> > > need to first make sure you can debug any binary running on your target
> > > board remotely. Then, you can treat the VM as the rest ordinary binary.
> > >
> >
> > I don't want to debug VM itself here, but executable running on the
> > VM. As my VM has a new instruction set, and GDB is quite unlikely to
> > run locally.
>
> OK, so you have two issues:
> 1) You need to get gdbserver running in your VM, and provide
> some means for gdbserver to talk to a gdb that is running in the
> outside world.  Unles you have access to a serial port, the
> obvious way to do this is to get a IP stack running in the VM,
> assign it an IP address, and let gdbserver open up a socket.
> Then gdb (running somewhere outside of the VM) can attach to
> the socket.
>

I have implemented a debug server in VM. At the moment, it can read
the RSP messages from remote GDB through socket. So, I think I have
done this part.

> 2) You need to teach gdb to understand the architecture of
> your virtual machine -- the word size, the instruction language,
> the register set, and so forth.  That doesn't mean porting gdb
> to RUN on the VM -- it just means teaching gdb how to DEBUG
> the VM (meaning, debug something that is running in the VM).
>

How can I achieve this part? At the moment, after received a packet
from remote GDB, I am trying to parse the packet first, and then send
the right response to GDB. For example,  if VM received a "info
registers" command at the debug socket, it will try to collect
register information, and then generate a right RSP message back.  Or,
if it received "next", I can set a flag in VM to indicate to only
execute one instruction. Is that a right way to do?

Qian

>
>
>
>
>