From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id fOJqJ6HRkGf3RhcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:08:17 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=oh83C/Rb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 937681E100; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:08:17 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286241E08E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:08:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78113857706 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:08:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B78113857706 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1737544096; bh=QNLhDIqYfVGLqmOQ7D9jSFTpqVjVQOkd4nR9uiD827o=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=oh83C/Rb7ixsS9VAFpSYMgUitYghpy118/6NxnCA59/t2aLhdDIwGpaKyG0apeBdM 0zXsje1ZEaWG2H6qLkwnJzWrITn35aOzuQ0emfA3MEjZsoDDWEj0ylar8d0CubYQWd S8I2Ln1pJK8yVwMsA4SmwZgPHAcS4UGH+FzySo7g= Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A513858420 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:07:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C9A513858420 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org C9A513858420 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1737544042; cv=none; b=F8ozqzUQUUHzHg2PjSuGY7RI3A6fqHD5tjQ57gIf0xR3DynSgvo6lV1rZOOpD67SlhfORGilTFZjVdsCNC+h94k7vP+2o2KuZBmtgb6ck1gL+0tevltZN7dQLflIgQervc1pYm9vQ9IrZpuVCLRBG4URAmQPsalZ7RGH5hQmZNY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1737544042; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Lfqe8c7Hi1ZOI3MyxHtzutIGyA7zPe8B1mRGBQzEGaU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=XUd8K+jckeRyvFsGo0yiAFXcHilrwWZWsl9ebIWha8c65XR05dXh/IOY/QDfjFylSuig7dDpa4Mv2UTx+vUF5Ak/RB7cANLW1nrW0aBajy5s0ZxQDPKmND6FNygxfMjG5wjmMYno2t7LOx7fAKtmDc3ROkaO+lsYNiv9PHqa34s= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C9A513858420 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4364a37a1d7so66655525e9.3 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:07:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737544040; x=1738148840; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QNLhDIqYfVGLqmOQ7D9jSFTpqVjVQOkd4nR9uiD827o=; b=iGVNUDvR8Id4Qh9/VuoxVDQ0I2G21tpgbAS/FT7jbebLXpIstOnApNWwYX08sKFQdZ ZT1RzVV+eqt/9t7iAjVuoWETSDjKHjuNOyX5vMCwBf0pKg0j3kRif+0aEkjwl9wtE3Ap pMOxBzulxuJQeCCcpnAYz6CVp+ChG+KY8ALd5i3O4s9Syvv9Xbr0IUSfA8FbGoJSeCmq kpOof+x+LDn31QY7lmJAeVDZq/swE6uA0ScK0WAEwq/9RNGtSm+9RERK7suVUQMcEod0 iPqKBFbsdqqfYdmPCw9kQVPTri+SDNjvAHbizKQO11oUnbEQB6iCDD0s1g+DjZGgS6b9 mvug== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWLtF3Umg5SuUDgAcAXK5bX5zTH34wsn4+WnTRhRoEs/FSUeoWt82vs2nyPLaXpf6Mn/lc=@sourceware.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzyy8bcId5XQYG7PxsltbccW4aHHP12s0uzIjt8oV1XwWiTGeqB ezzFwPhncrgWa8XBY9wBaV3HnEtrHWJM0vvaHwX7CVBvJH6T4tjvbhkQiKzT X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv3XHls4COk3t3+wxlAeCoF8YXx714/7ivb/Y01+nIEFMbT4P89zUMbP1YA5jz 5IOXfePfaofzMf5c6l5WY0zzv5w4qleiuwZXUX4In4Q7NnPIbYW58VAv12C/YmodZCANYr9OFyM 4hjCcHoRfsDlAb2ZJRyqB38jHjcEB27yCGnGBPLMccqtcnb9FbKOgFACLQ5U74WUmLNmeWG4OuB 6DAb5aEZ5akaY4t0LkEfGAzdy0IQ3xGN9fTvworrUvaEUAYDfIk3Xpyl1SFYxLI+Fw69xF9NWc/ tCvHhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFrr2lq6WHhY8NG/fq1hhrCEwYbeQRFpslQ1M2EsdspaVXxaf6z8xpQuMMlEQwiHzxQKmkY1g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:34c1:b0:438:a432:7c44 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-438a4327dadmr118509415e9.21.1737544040368; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:07:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from takamaka.gnat.com ([2a01:cb22:1d5:1100:e8d7:7ec4:1ec0:6daf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-438b31af925sm20622745e9.23.2025.01.22.03.07.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by takamaka.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA6CF80545; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:07:17 +0400 (+04) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:07:17 +0400 To: Andrew Burgess Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 16.1 released! Message-ID: References: <87tt9smftq.fsf@redhat.com> <87o6zzm7r3.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o6zzm7r3.fsf@redhat.com> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Joel Brobecker via Gdb Reply-To: Joel Brobecker Errors-To: gdb-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" > >> If/when this is merged I do plan to back-port this to the gdb-16-branch, > >> but given the build following the suggested steps works fine, I'm not > >> sure this justifies a follow up release. But I wanted to raise this for > >> discussion. > > > > I fear that using a relative path to configure when building out-of-tree > > might be fairly common. Thankfully, the workaround is relatively > > straightforward, so once users get the answer, they can move forward > > quickly, but getting this answer may not be straightforward. > > > > It might be worth doing a first corrective release right away. > > The bfd fix was approved and merged to master. I have also pushed the > fix to the gdb-16-branch. If we did want a corrective fix then we have > everything we need in place. Great news! What's the general sentiment towards the corrective release? Do people agree that it's worth the effort doing on now? -- Joel