From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ANOSL/M8PGN9cQUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:02:27 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B31451E112; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:02:27 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=BlXmuF4F; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 490E31E0CB for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:02:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BACD385DC2D for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:02:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8BACD385DC2D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1664892146; bh=YSKCBa+q/I0qN121WXBE0sGs07508KLSibSndopvEZk=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=BlXmuF4FQL8pDY4FkgH+fMEFfjhMQgn5dtRtGCHYk94tKTiTkzBJtdMRDMiIb/obD q6T9lCREaloND0nLKyDYc4kqiC14Lnff7oivIF2OPlkYrkvJRiGFBRI1lzeBcjkxKV 7YA+T23SbeNpvAg8Ld2KN6iewx7SqOib6fmKTnjk= Received: from elastic.org (elastic.org [96.126.110.187]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9BD3858CDA; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:01:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9D9BD3858CDA Received: from vpn-home.elastic.org ([10.0.0.2] helo=elastic.org) by elastic.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ofiUN-0007s0-1X; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:01:39 +0000 Received: from very.elastic.org ([192.168.1.1]) by elastic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ofiUN-000MUq-0Y; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:01:39 -0400 Received: from fche by very.elastic.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ofiUN-00DyLZ-0Q; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:01:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:01:39 -0400 To: Overseers mailing list Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> X-Sender-Verification: "" X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gdb" Reply-To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar , gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , binutils@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi - > [...] I think the LF proposal is the best long term way forward for > the GNU toolchain projects to remain competitive *and* Free. [...] Can you elaborate what risks in terms of competitiveness or freedom you foresee with the status quo? This is the first I recall hearing of this concern. - FChE