From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ONO/Mr+UZmIGdQIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:31:59 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C48F51E058; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=LmTVstN+; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57AA41E00D for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EEF385781D for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:31:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 71EEF385781D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1650889918; bh=VxLXBOQvxLW4ZoaMcFBb11miLzKafLoAgVUG+Yh4V84=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=LmTVstN+r6CSnWYyE7FCNK2nTQE7JkOPpnXdWel8WfHEUKgIUGVrztNbKV0VfNexB PonyXon2lHM3lJV2oPCibvxvmDNQa+9PV6r/Txcg02En0pxkq/C5kRxuMbzG1kr7BO TYMhaB/YJ8kJuBzSxQjB7m7FlQUyTAsp4ZngQV3s= Received: from elastic.org (elastic.org [96.126.110.187]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 927EB3858D28; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:30:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 927EB3858D28 Received: from vpn-home.elastic.org ([10.0.0.2] helo=elastic.org) by elastic.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nixrL-0005in-Ch; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:30:31 +0000 Received: from fche by elastic.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nixrK-000Spz-Rx; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:30:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:30:30 -0400 To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: Adding binutils to the GNU Toolchain buildbot on sourceware Message-ID: References: <5c1f217a-109c-2973-6c69-abf412133dee@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c1f217a-109c-2973-6c69-abf412133dee@arm.com> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gdb" Reply-To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" , Overseers mailing list , Mark Wielaard , binutils@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Hi - > An additional buildbot job for gdb/gdbserver would be fine. It's just that a > single build for everything is simpler, in my opinion. Yes, that would be interesting. > Is the idea to revive the old buildbot we had for GDB, but for binutils? We're welcoming the gdb project on the new buildbot server. Just need to set up some workers from the community. - FChE