From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 4cR0O13cB2EbRwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 07:51:57 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E460A1EDFB; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 07:51:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940631E79C for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 07:51:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFADB3888C72 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 11:51:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DFADB3888C72 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1627905116; bh=RF1w4R4gJ5iPJNtTLtlZXiIDNtU5dt3WIlkPDnjbpEU=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=nVXjmD5iwAigHeLNbqMz+95VmeIbzH//x/fhOzvKjql156FpS4Y1wBtgvvmK4hwIU r02WSvd/qHHXPRja9Na8Ki8ntJB2CbS/lKrBCRIW8CdfKfC3FcIsXsEpLzOe8t8kv+ /gbMOm5I4OsAfU3rpOBQR3Q9XJ+Im6oXwFqD3axs= Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C16F3858404 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 11:51:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4C16F3858404 Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id y12so24087912edo.6 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-description:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=RF1w4R4gJ5iPJNtTLtlZXiIDNtU5dt3WIlkPDnjbpEU=; b=I59X6XY/pkP2bn4w2HOl+xOOFx+2mNgXvGvAp/ZPcp8i1UjLt1O2T99qybTXiJjMn4 ru7cU5akPhUz9y8/cAQhfA28nKEvJzyxP03jwDsfut+rIqc9Rplz4hxCF8bcNRjdYYq1 Z+D1A+quK6wmutd+paoRiisL3Z/vgrm/dkvCew/ibi53ihRrs26BnWp9xVGtHBeF+JUj eL8pejBfU9wRuDBcaCzlxTs2eRprot4XMaPc/j/Wa0ZiIPpPkU0s3q6R0Vagd2lzEMul /qfSV71k1BMBBs7scZ245Pzg1iTmzxrqOoRfgn0K822g/yML5gK+5w7uCPNVSaOjb38d tktw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53235jvNp9hdHMCNfyHeNccmRg5MTi7WMGI/87ojIXimr/qrLu0U 2lwEvWdz9otAwS6I/GkzH69D00lkJuGBaQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCMV67VV1XQtwFmzC8we/oOhzK3GQnIHJ5yAONwmFmRI9YuVFf3YIxxmQx/AfXIaJp9h4Dqw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:cf81:: with SMTP id h1mr10681024edk.106.1627905091452; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 04:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com ([2a03:1b20:3:f011::10d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p18sm5886150edu.8.2021.08.02.04.51.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Aug 2021 04:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:51:59 +0200 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Custom types in target description XMLs Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: upshot Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Shahab Vahedi via Gdb Reply-To: Shahab Vahedi Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" For the record, this problem was reported under PR28103 [1] and PR28104 [2]. It has been resolved by the following patches in master and gdb-11-branch: gdb: Fix numerical field extraction for target ... [3][4] gdb: Make the builtin "boolean" type an unsigned type [5][6] Cheers, Shahab [1] Incorrect extraction of integer fields in target description... https://sourceware.org/PR28103 [2] Incorrect extraction of boolean fields in target description... https://sourceware.org/PR28104 [3] [master] gdb: Fix numerical field extraction for target... https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=c9bd985 [4] [gdb-11] gdb: Fix numerical field extraction for target... https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=70417f2 [5] [master] gdb: Make the builtin "boolean" type an unsigned type https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=91254b9 [6] [gdb-11] gdb: Make the builtin "boolean" type an unsigned type https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=e4c1aea