From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id w4iyOBreY2DMewAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:27:38 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D9D051EE0E; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:27:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EEAD1E783 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:27:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70243858001; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:27:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E70243858001 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1617157657; bh=VtgCPlwIp19O55QY9GXD7ccvJYeNie8+cIwjU60TH28=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=Jq6z27/h2YcjWfSO+oOP+Mz8iB72xulAxUBNw/1G/MpeRMk1Xmxtmn748uhhdPbPK PyllsrD0UHe3j/T+q3Rvo49S9Ocs5UBO52OhTEImPi+LgxAxYAt/3pZsVlSKo7LXMa S81pdPgAMtW+8Vs9wQfp92j7XI3mdRechjZ4p2bk= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0163858001 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:27:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3E0163858001 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877D7335CEE for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:27:34 -0400 To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sourceware.org References: <8335wyj461.fsf@gnu.org> <83tup9disi.fsf@gnu.org> <20210323110638.GA6592@embecosm.com> <83wntwjy8h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210324165918.GA1683671@embecosm.com> <83lfacjvsj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb Reply-To: Mike Frysinger Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 24 Mar 2021 14:44, Mike Frysinger via Gdb wrote: > On 24 Mar 2021 19:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Andrew Burgess > > > Eli Zaretskii [2021-03-24 18:46:38 +0200]: > > > > From: Mike Frysinger > > > > > Eli: those patches look OK to you too ? > > > > > > > > They just add the script to our repository, AFAICT, so I of course > > > > have no objections. > > > > > > No the second proposes to replace the current ChangeLog with one > > > auto-generated upon release. > > > > > > This ChangeLog would in effect be a reformatted `git log` output. > > > > I don't object to that, either. The question is: what we will require > > the Git log messages to contain then? Currently, the entire ChangeLog > > entry goes there, but once the manually written ChangeLog files are > > retired, what will remain? That was the crux of the recent > > discussion. > > we won't require the ChangeLog-like entries in the commit message for sim/. > the generated ChangeLog will have name+date+git log. i wanted to give time for people to respond & post any thoughts that they might have lingering before i moved forward. since things have gone quiet now, i guess we've reached the end? so i'll give another few days before i land the change for sim/. -mike