From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id CTt6KI+IW2DyZwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:44:31 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 96DE01EF7C; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:44:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C13F1E789 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420C43857C50; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:44:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 420C43857C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1616611470; bh=d22LrS1ZNRzTZKYPKsmlrn/P40tT8ZzmKr1iWdMWciw=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=WAfoGtqNRV6GqpQoguPV9Fug/zVJMfFoaAyfgpEZdgG8o+/c5q7Djbf9fKYOytZm8 b21dCC0IkMKUsv6nGemfy2aWr/ajUOGbgbuEi1MDDCKREPdnL2NCBROf8jmlWhrFul ViGZ/yRTb/158FpvW15pYoWXsBg6V77TRL0cpP10= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60013851C39 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:44:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D60013851C39 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17363406C0; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:44:25 -0400 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Andrew Burgess , gdb@sourceware.org References: <8335wyj461.fsf@gnu.org> <83tup9disi.fsf@gnu.org> <20210323110638.GA6592@embecosm.com> <83wntwjy8h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210324165918.GA1683671@embecosm.com> <83lfacjvsj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83lfacjvsj.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb Reply-To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" On 24 Mar 2021 19:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > From: Andrew Burgess > > Eli Zaretskii [2021-03-24 18:46:38 +0200]: > > > From: Mike Frysinger > > > > Eli: those patches look OK to you too ? > > > > > > They just add the script to our repository, AFAICT, so I of course > > > have no objections. > > > > No the second proposes to replace the current ChangeLog with one > > auto-generated upon release. > > > > This ChangeLog would in effect be a reformatted `git log` output. > > I don't object to that, either. The question is: what we will require > the Git log messages to contain then? Currently, the entire ChangeLog > entry goes there, but once the manually written ChangeLog files are > retired, what will remain? That was the crux of the recent > discussion. we won't require the ChangeLog-like entries in the commit message for sim/. the generated ChangeLog will have name+date+git log. -mike