From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24545 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2002 06:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24534 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 06:06:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 06:06:22 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA23222; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:06:12 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:06:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: todd whitesel cc: GDB Developers Subject: Re: Two files with embedded control-M's In-Reply-To: <200211280035.QAA21146@alabama.wrs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, todd whitesel wrote: > (How does one construct a patch in this case? Will email preserve CRLF's?) I wouldn't trust mail agents on this one. I suggest sending the patch as a binary attachment, perhaps uuencoded or in base64.