From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5336 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 05:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5329 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 05:11:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 05:11:29 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA17255; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:08:55 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 22:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Benjamin Tze-Kit Lee , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: using tracepoints function with both host and target on same computer In-Reply-To: <20020806215201.GA5715@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If I have more free time than I expect to (:-) then I would like > to add this to gdbserver; but that won't be for at least six months. IMHO, tracepoints should really become part of GDB itself, even for native debugging. That would allow us to debug programs where timing is critical, such as real-time software, Emacs display engine, etc. I miss that feature a lot.