From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3246 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2002 05:12:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3226 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2002 05:12:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2002 05:12:07 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA27740; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 08:09:59 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:12:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: gdb/575: Don't use setjmp / longjmp, use catch_exceptions() et.al.?] In-Reply-To: <3D0F45C9.6030401@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > GDB eliminated most of the setjmp() / longjmp()'s long ago. I think I > should formalize this as part of the internals doco and add it to the ARI. > > thoughts? Yes, I agree.