From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7270 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 10:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7251 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 10:23:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 10:23:48 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA04050; Wed, 15 May 2002 13:21:59 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 03:23:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Multi-arch and user-control of architecture flags In-Reply-To: <200205150932.KAA23374@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Wed, 15 May 2002, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > So how feasible would it be to extend the "set" and "show" commands so > that they could sub-set the information? For example, to allow > > set > > and > > show > > or even > > show > > to show all variables specific to the target. I don't know how hard is this, but I like the idea from the UI point of view.