From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 722 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 13:47:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 706 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 13:47:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 May 2002 13:47:38 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA25576; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:45:22 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 06:47:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain cc: charsquarra@hotmail.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: questions / suggestions about gdb In-Reply-To: <200205081248.g48CmHh12611@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 On Wed, 8 May 2002, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > I've done work along these lines and I might resume it in the future. > However, the idea of keeping the "retarded" process running in parallel > in real time is difficult and unworkable. Agreed. However, it would be a great feature to be able to run the program in reverse. Some debuggers actually allow that (don't ask me how).