From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2450 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 14:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2426 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 14:05:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 14:05:28 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA22750; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:03:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:05:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: chanskw@ca.ibm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Questions about GDB-MI Interface In-Reply-To: <3CC80775.8070803@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > It was added with much hesitation because there was real concern that > once a vaguely looking console mechanism was added, people would try to > use it instead of investing the time and resources needed to address the > problem of implementing a real console interface. What was envisioned as a solution for the problem at hand, namely, that any decent front-end to GDB must allow the user to type CLI commands?